What recent jury verdicts reveal about today's car accident cases

Nearly a quarter of America's biggest jury verdicts come from car crashes, but the vast majority of crash claims never reach a jury at all. The factors that decide a claim are injury severity, fault, and evidence.

After reviewing a decade of jury verdicts that reached over $10 million, the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform found that motor vehicle cases account for 23.2% of them. But that share comes from 1,288 verdicts spread across ten years and the entire country. Judgments in the millions are possible, but they are counted precisely because they are rare.

The figures from this jury verdict analysis show how, while the big verdicts are what make the headlines, actual car accident legal trends resolve far more quietly.

Car Crashes Set the Benchmark for Jury Verdicts

State courts saw an estimated 5.04 million motor vehicle tort filings between 2014 and 2023, making these the most common kind of civil case in the country by quite a large margin. In federal court over the same period, half of those filings ended in settlement, and only 7% were resolved by judgment. Recent jury decisions are always influential, but that's especially true in these cases because they're what auto insurance companies use as the baseline for injury claims.

These cases can also affect insurance rates outside of auto incidents. A slip-and-fall incident, for example, might use precedent from auto cases because the adjuster handling it works from the same internal tables.

Punitive Damages Are Rarer Than People Think

Part of the gap between what people expect and what they get comes down to punitive damages. Punitive damages are the extra money a jury adds to a ruling to punish a defendant rather than compensate the victim.

Those awards are what tend to make the headlines, but they're nowhere near as common as the news makes them seem.

What that means for the average person is that in an ordinary car accident claim, punitive damages are effectively off the table. Instead, most cases focus on compensation rather than financial punishment. But forgoing the punitive approach doesn't mean you have an easy case on your hands. You'll still need to gather evidence before it's too late.

Legal strategies for accidents now start almost immediately, which is why firms including Triumph Law Group attorneys open that record in the first week.

Evidence Supports the Claim

Three categories of evidence are most likely to influence jury verdicts in a car crash claim. Here's what they are: 

• Medical records establish that the injury is real and connected to the crash, not to something that happened before or after it
• Photographs and videos can provide an objective account of what happened
• Accident reports establish who caused the collision and how it happened in the eyes of the authorities

Insurers weigh all three long before a case reaches a courtroom, which is why documentation matters even in claims that will never see a jury.

There Are No Typical Jury Verdicts

The data points to a much less predictable picture than the biggest jury verdicts suggest. A car accident claim can end in a relatively small award or a substantial one, depending on what happened, who was responsible, and how the injuries affect the plaintiff's life.

If you're interested in learning more about local news and events, see our article archives for more.

This article was prepared by an independent contributor which helps us continue delivering quality content to our audiences.