OneD process passes independent test

MOSES LAKE — Testing by a third party has indicated the process used by a company with a battery development facility in Moses Lake is less harmful to the environment than traditional alternatives, according to an announcement from OneD Battery Sciences. The results of testing by Minviro were released Tuesday. 

Vincent Pluvinage, OneD chief executive officer, said the company submitted its process and its product to testing by an outside company to determine if its process reduces the amount of CO2 used in manufacturing batteries used in electric vehicles.  

The tests determined that the OneD process could reduce the CO2 emissions produced by manufacturers by as much as 35%.  

The case for vehicles run solely by electricity, Pluvinage said, is that they don’t contribute as much to CO2 emissions. 

“When you drive around an EV, you don’t produce any CO2,” Pluvinage said. “But then people say, ‘Wait a minute, you’re quite right, there is no CO2 produced when you drive around, but it took a lot of energy and manufacturing to produce the battery.’ So people start asking, ‘What about the CO2 that was involved in making all of the battery materials and making the batteries? How much is that, and is that a problem?’ And it’s a fair question.” 

In addition, Pluvinage said, most contemporary battery manufacture use graphite as the main component. 

“Ninety-five percent of all the graphite that is used in EV batteries in the United States and Europe comes from China,” he said.  

Chinese manufacturers have less environmentally friendly sources of power, Pluvinage said, not to mention the risk of one country supplying the majority of a crucial manufacturing component.  

“What OneD has done – and it took us many, many years – is that we invented and patented a process where we can add some silicon inside the pores of the graphite particles. When we add the silicon, we actually can reduce the amount of graphite drastically,” he said.  

It was important though, he said, to put the process to the test to confirm the claims made for it. 

“We wanted to add the last element. We wanted to add an element that proves scientifically that the carbon footprint of the battery is reduced because of our technology,” he said.  

It was important, however, to have the analysis conducted by a company with no connection to OneD, he said. The British company, Minviro, conducted what is called a comprehensive life cycle assessment. 

“You need to give them all of your data about the manufacturing process,” he said. "Then they have a bunch of scientists that compute the carbon footprint and compare (that result) to today’s batteries that have been made with imported graphite from China. And when they finish writing that report – and that takes many, many, many months and answering tons of questions – that's not the end.” 

The Minviro report was then reviewed by a panel of scientists who were anonymous to the company, using long-established international standards. 

“It’s a very rigorous process,” Pluvinage said. 

The independent analysis increases the company’s credibility, he said. 

“This issue of having scientific data being verified by a third party, in many areas of business is very important,” he said.  

    The OneD Battery Sciences team had a successful first run of SINANODE production in July of last year. From left: Abel de la Ossa, Tyson Olson, Leo Martinez, Andy Kirk, Jan-Marc Luchies, Rufino Garza, Leo Rodriguez, Nick Kamerath ,Ioan Horvat, Mario Hernandez, Klaas Heres, Justin Weckerle, Vincent Pluvinage.